Shouldn't its name be changed?
Or the max gradient method still 'evaluates' something?

"Thorsten Froehlich" <tho### [at] trfde> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:3c0a2493@news.povray.org...
> In article <3c0a0636@news.povray.org> , "JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>
> > Evaluate still changes your max_gradient: is it supposed to work this
way?
>
> Yes, 'evaluate' is the dynamic max gradient method now.  the documentation
> has not been fully updated and the output of the warnings when 'evaluate'
is
> used is not perfect yet.  There is going to be some more fine-tuning for
the
> 'evaluate' warnings.  However, the max gradient warnings without evaluiate
> are correct as long as they aren't zero.  The output of zero will be
> eliminated in a future beta.
>
>     Thorsten
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
> e-mail: tho### [at] trfde
>
> Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org

Post a reply to this message